Single source provider er en anden betegnelse for monopol. Google er et gode og det er et onde. Jeg tror langt hen ad vejen (endnu) det er et spørgsmål om hvad man selv synes. Internettet har vist sig som et meget kraftigt demokratisk medie og som jeg tidligere har hævdet så er et par fejltrin fra Google nok til at vi sammen kan bringe Google på ret kurs. Den dag der er en organisation som med rette kan hævde at de ejer Internette - da er vi på r....
/Sik
Single Source Provider is another term for monopoly. Google is good and Google is evil. I believe (still) that Google is what you make it to. The Internet is the most powerful democratic tool ever invented and as I has stated earlier it is only a matter of a few errors from the Google palace and you will see the full potential of a united Internet community. Not even Google would want that against them. When the day comes that a single organisation rightly can claim that they own the Internet - then we are all f.....
/Sik
Quote
Randall Stross at The New York Times goes to bat
for the Google/Yahoo search marketingdeal, saying there’s “nothing to fear” from the two companies linking their search products. I believe most of his analysis is wrong, and he also skips the publisher side of the market entirely. In short, I feel that he is exactly wrong in both his approach and his conclusions.[...]
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar