Torden og lynild ... igen ser man at GIS leverandørerne skal tage sig af GIS delen og overlade distributionen/performance til experterne ...
/Sik
Bolt and lightning ... again an example showing how GIS developers should stick to the GIS part and leave distribution/performance to the experts ...
/Sik
Quote
James says:
We’ve been loading our tile caches in Amazon S3 for quite some time now and it looks like others are trying to take advantage of the service. I’ve come to the conclusion that using S3 for your tile cache makes a ton of sense for performance and reliability issues. Our S3 tile caches are more reliable than our file servers in serving up the tiles and do it so much faster. Is anyone else noticing the benefits of S3 or has is been problematic for you?
Read more: http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/12/17/arcgis-map-server-cache-in-amazon-s3/
Read more: http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/2008/12/17/arcgis-map-server-cache-in-amazon-s3/
Ingen kommentarer:
Send en kommentar